The link between Safety Management Systems SMS and Human Factors HF
Published
on October 12, 2016
One way of looking at the relationship
is to consider that SMS puts the flesh on the HF Skeleton. A strong
organizational SMS system can deliver not just added safety but added value
too.
It is early days in the evolution of
the implemented SMS systems so significant data is not in abundance, however
that SMS works and has a bearing on Human Factor behaviour is shown by looking
at the Accident statistics for 2012 which was the safest year on record
relative to the size of aviation business activities.
It is a fundamental wish of all
businesses to operate effectively and to receive an acceptable return on the
underlying investment.
Whilst for more “Tangible” expenditures
it is relatively straight forward to develop business models that show what is
happening with the finances, when we turn our attention to Human Factors and
Safety Management Systems, it becomes considerably more difficult to develop
measures to show direct gain.
However it should be understood that it
is of paramount importance to develop effective systems to show exactly the
financial benefits, otherwise we directly impact the challenge of raising
internal funding for the changes needed to promote positive HF related
behaviours within the Organizations SMS system.
So we need to understand the costs
which the business incurs on a routine basis and use these costs to
develop a set of values which we can use to show the benefits to the Return on
Investment ROI by changes which are driven by SMS and HF organizational
processes.
Discuss these issues with your company accountant
who has the responsibility for the financial modeling to see how this can be
developed specifically in the best way for the organization.
If we can develop effective metrics
including financial KPI’s we are making steps in the right direction which will
only serve s a positive effect on the business over time.
Consider that this area is also to be
considered with the core competencies of the Safety Manager and that as in all
Competency oversight systems, a gap or shortfall generates a training needs
analysis.
In a proactive SMS system where the
risks are to be reduced to a level which is as low as reasonably practical
ALARP then we have to face the fact that safety too has a cost. The more we are
able to quantify the benefits in an effective way the stronger the business
case for change.
No comments:
Post a Comment