Monday 19 September 2016

Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) - the unstoppable future of aviation and its impact on ATSEP

Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) - the unstoppable future of aviation and its impact on ATSEP
Carlos Viegas IFATSEA - SESAR SJU Liason

As all who read last year’s installment
in this ATSEP magazine will remember,
it was promised that a second installment
would bring into focus the introduction
to the subject of RPAS then
made.
The time spanning these two articles
has been well spent; at the time for example
when we spoke of the need to
have mandatory detect and avoid systems
and software on all small RPAS
and very especially the line of sight variety,
the response at the time was: “too
heavy, too expensive…not possible!”.
Today all are unanimous; yes, it is absolutely
necessary and unavoidable.
This can be used to Gage the extreme
speed at which the RPAS are being understood
and their unstoppable potential
is being made clear.
But…as always the aeronautical community
and its institutions need to have
a cool collective head and look further
down the time line to be able to regulate
adequately, this is no easy task because
the regulator for the first time is
put at the door of an as yet unseen scenario:
..the regulator from now on needs
to be proactive in the case of RPAS but
also in all other highly automated ATM
systems.
Tradition dictated that regulation would
come into force in a scenario of well-known
variables which were not foreseen
to change in the near future…
..that was until we all started to think of
new highly automated ATM systems deployment.
Then we realized that today change in
ATM is possible and demanded at a
breakneck speed, so the regulator
needs to adapt its regulated strategy
too and deployment needs to give the
regulator feedback on issues found in
change management so that regulation
may be reviewed, this is an endless
cycle from now on.
Another issue of concern…and this
might be odd coming from an engineer,
who is above all a concerned human
being, we cannot let ourselves be
driven by our capability to produce new
and cheap solutions…with no time to
test them thoroughly and certainly no
time to evaluate what are the consequences
of a huge paradigm shift: integrating
an ever increasing number of
RPAS in non-segregated airspace
The economic appeal is easy to see but
the initial investment to guarantee
safety and security to all RPAS in their
access to non-segregated airspace is
not trivial as is the method in which this
takes place.
As yet no clear answers come up on
how the communications, telemetry and
payload of RPAS that take off from platforms
not situated at airports are controlled
or logged.
Recent documents state that the operator
of the RPAS is responsible…. well
yes, we know that! it would always be
so.
Probably the most important question
would be: does he care?
Plug and Fly springs to mind as a solution
to the communications and telemetry
part but the payload issue is clearly
very different and more complex.
Small RPAS cannot be seen isolated
from the universe in which they fly, the
dimensions of these, while small, interacts
with huge and passenger carrying
airliners and as such represent a huge
potential to disrupt safe and secure passenger
carrier operations.
This is of course only true if proper regulatory
measures are not put in place
before they take to the skies in droves.
The Impact on ATSEP roles and responsibilities:
This depends hugely on how and what
technologies are used to integrate the
digital communication network that will
serve all the air systems.
If these are integrated with other highly
automated ATM systems in a future
SMC, then the ATSEP have their work
cut out for sure.
The monitoring and control of this network
as well as its systems health management
is critical to maintain the RPAS
operating safely and predictably.
This is true only for the small systems
foreseen to fly below approach level because
above that the RPAS will have to
take off and land in airports due to their
dimension and this means that they will
use the same systems that the manned
aircraft use.
In both case it is however very important
to retain the fact that the criticality
of the ground systems that the ATSEP
monitor and control is of a very much

higher level than is true today.

No comments:

Post a Comment