Saturday 19 September 2015

Conclusions and Recommendations from research work



CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

          Effects of roofing materials on propagation of air navigation signal have generally been determined. Firstly the research revealed that roofing materials have little effect on navaids signal strength particularly in the transmission path. However the effects were very significant in the reflective path. Secondly it was found that some materials interacted with navaids signal and caused decrease in received signal strength (RSS) while others caused increase in RSS over similar transmission distance but these effects were not significant. Lastly the research established that roofing materials have no significant effect on wave polarization.

          The highest and lowest mean attenuation occurred at angles of incidence of 90 and 135 degrees respectively. It was shown that the lowest received signal strength occurred on decra material at an angle of 135 degrees while the highest occurred on iron at 90 degrees. The attenuation ratio decreased as the angle of incidence was varied from 0 degrees to 90 degree. The highest and lowest mean reflection occurred at angles of incidence of 90 and 135 degrees respectively. It was shown that the lowest reflected signal strength occurred on clay material at an angle of 135 degrees while the highest occurred on steel at 90 degrees. Generally the reflected received signal ratio increased as angle of incidence varied from 0 degrees to 90 degrees across all materials. It was therefore deduced that angle of incidence has significant effect on navaids signal strength in both transmission and reflective paths.

It has been observed that the interaction of roofing materials with navaids signals has no significant effect on recommended minimum signal strength in the transmission path except in the reflective path. For distances that were considered in these experiments, these materials had no significant effect on transmission distance since the received signal was within the recommended signal strength.

Despite the differences a statistical analysis revealed that roofing materials have little effect on wave polarization. It can be concluded that roofing materials have no significant effect on radiation patterns. Therefore a radiation pattern which is a prime variable in the operation of navaids systems cannot be altered by the presence of roofing materials in the propagation path.
Further results showed that there was a strong negative correlation (r = -0.9944) between attenuated and reflected signals at various angles assuming constant effect of roofing material. This implies that angles that provide high attenuation exhibit low reflections and vise versa when material-type is constant. A correlation factor of 0.9611 showed that there was a strong positive correlation between attenuated and reflected signals across roofing materials assuming a constant angle of incidence. It implies that materials that provide high attenuation exhibit high reflections at constant angle,

Relationship between path loss exponent of a roofing material and transmission distance need to be studied further so as to explain why there is a mix of positive and negative correlation.

Further studies should be directed in conducting experiments in open fields and factoring in sources of variability arising from the environment so as to actualize the scenario of flight navigation.
It is also recommended that similar studies should be conducted on roofing materials other than those considered in this research.

No comments:

Post a Comment