CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Effects of
roofing materials on propagation of air navigation signal have generally been
determined. Firstly the
research revealed that roofing materials have little effect on navaids signal
strength particularly in the transmission path. However the effects were very
significant in the reflective path. Secondly it was found that some materials
interacted with navaids signal and caused decrease in received signal strength
(RSS) while others caused increase in RSS over similar transmission distance
but these effects were not significant. Lastly the research established that
roofing materials have no significant effect on wave polarization.
The highest
and lowest mean attenuation occurred at angles of incidence of 90 and 135
degrees respectively. It was shown that the lowest received signal strength occurred
on decra material at an angle of 135 degrees while the highest occurred on iron
at 90 degrees. The attenuation ratio decreased as the angle of incidence was
varied from 0 degrees to 90 degree. The highest and lowest mean reflection
occurred at angles of incidence of 90 and 135 degrees respectively. It was
shown that the lowest reflected signal strength occurred on clay material at an
angle of 135 degrees while the highest occurred on steel at 90 degrees.
Generally the reflected received signal ratio increased as angle of incidence
varied from 0 degrees to 90 degrees across all materials. It was therefore
deduced that angle of incidence has significant effect on navaids signal
strength in both transmission and reflective paths.
It has been observed that
the interaction of roofing materials with navaids signals has no significant
effect on recommended minimum signal strength in the transmission path except
in the reflective path. For distances that were considered in these
experiments, these materials had no significant effect on transmission distance
since the received signal was within the recommended signal strength.
Despite the differences a
statistical analysis revealed that roofing materials have little effect on wave
polarization. It can be concluded that roofing materials have no significant
effect on radiation patterns. Therefore a radiation pattern which is a prime
variable in the operation of navaids systems cannot be altered by the presence
of roofing materials in the propagation path.
Further
results showed that there was a strong negative correlation (r = -0.9944)
between attenuated and reflected signals at various angles assuming constant
effect of roofing material. This implies that angles that provide high
attenuation exhibit low reflections and vise versa when material-type is
constant. A correlation factor of 0.9611 showed that there was a strong
positive correlation between attenuated and reflected signals across roofing
materials assuming a constant angle of incidence. It implies that materials
that provide high attenuation exhibit high reflections at constant angle,
Relationship between path loss exponent of a roofing material
and transmission distance need to be studied further so as to explain why there
is a mix of positive and negative correlation.
Further studies should be directed in conducting experiments
in open fields and factoring in sources of variability arising from the environment
so as to actualize the scenario of flight navigation.
It is also recommended that similar studies should be
conducted on roofing materials other than those considered in this research.
No comments:
Post a Comment